Untitled-14

The discussion was pretty heated from the beginning (in between Quen Be De Knudson’s babbling – do you even know WTF you are talking about half the time? She made this comment about ‘working as a team’. What team are you talking about De? The Dave and De team that meets in secret and doesn’t let any of the other councilors in on anything?)

But Greg Jamison’s anti-first amendment and anti-citizen dissent speech was strange at best. I’ll have to give Kermit credit on this one, he took the high road. I think he realized trying to explain citizen’s free speech rights to Greg Jamison would have taken a lot of time so he just said “I’ll just disregard your comments.”

The video is well worth watching. As usual, Bob Litz gets frustrated and makes smartass remarks. He said that he was wondering if he was going to be charged for listening to Kermit’s lecture at last week’s land use meeting (referring to him being a college professor).

This is a good old fashioned political lynch mob, make no mistake about it. I hope Kermit continues to take the high road.

• On a side note, Kenny Anderson Jr. brings up the Arena contract negotiations and their contract renewal and asks why he can’t get any info from the mayor’s office on the issue. Kenny gets quite mad, especially since the city attorney was not there to answer his questions. Kenny, I’m sure Judge Bob was busy at Michelle’s coffee giving dirty stares to sarcastic bloggers 🙂

UPDATE: The Gargoyle Leader explains the situation, but leaves out some deets;

Jamison said he was disappointed by Litz’s behavior, and he said Staggers used the meeting to issue a “political positioning statement.”

“I really think we took a step backwards,” Jamison said.

First off, Kermit asked Greg what political statement he was referring to, and Greg proceeded to read a statement Kermit made during the land use meeting, and Kermit reiterated, “What part of that statement is political?” Greg couldn’t tell him. The irony of it all is that anything politicians say or do is ‘political’ they are politicians, so it was an incredibly stupid statement by Greg, but not surprising, the theatre major often has ridiculous speeches. Remember this is a guy who wore a AC/DC shirt to a informational meeting and tore up fake million dollar checks during an informational in a strange attempt to promote a new Events Center. Secondly, Kermit agreed with Greg that it was a ‘Step backwards’ especially when you try to squelch citizen’s free speech rights.

And Pat put it in persepective;

Costello also tried to put the issue to rest.

“From time to time, there’s going to be disagreements, and that’s probably a healthy thing,” he said.

Pat is right, that is the job of governing bodies, to debate issues, sometimes those debates are ugly, that’s government folks, take it or leave it. Playing nice and rubber stamping every piece of legislation isn’t always a good idea. Just look at what we got the first 6 years of the Bush administration with that approach, a freaking disaster.

And in reference to the campground ordinance that they were debating, I found this statement to be funny;

Regardless, the people there now are heading out. Dennis Nelson said he plans to move his camper to another campground outside the city, as do other residents. Nelson said he has to laugh when he hears city officials talk about affordable housing and homelessness, but then they come down on people living in campers and RVs.

“None of this is making any sense,” he said. “With all of this, it’s just not worth the problems.”

That is typical of the city, in the name of ‘progress’ they are often pushing the working poor to find other places to live. They did it when they tore down Penn View and they did it again when they tore down houses in the Pettigrew Heights neighborhood. They say they want to clean up the neighborhoods and give these people better places to live, but what they do not realize is that they cannot afford these ‘better places.’ Some councilors really need to walk a mile in these people’s shoes sometime, and wakeup to what is going on in this community.

I can’t believe Kermit was able to be this concise in so few words. Read it twice and make yourself a drink first (From the Argus Leader);

Business activity in Sioux Falls is down, the office building occupancy rate is at a record low, city sales tax revenue is down, unemployment is up, and more people out of necessity are visiting the Banquet and Food Pantry to obtain free food. In the midst of this economic downturn and suffering, city government probably will spend a record-breaking amount of money this year, and next year’s spending on the city’s operations budget will be 4 percent higher than this year.

Sioux Falls 2009 budget is a little over a half-billion

While Sioux Falls has a reputation for being a caring, compassionate community in which neighbors help each other during difficult times, unfortunately, the same cannot be said about the actions of city government.

Yes, it is a caring community. But something I learned a long time ago, two things have factored into this giving 1) Giving money instead of time 2) A tax write-off

During this time of economic recession, city government has placed additional financial burdens on citizens by increasing the sales tax, the property tax, water fees, sewer fees, platting fees, food inspection fees, signage fees, in addition to placing special tax assessments on numerous properties. Common sense dictates that when people are suffering from layoffs, firings and reduced wages, taxes and fees should not be raised but instead reduced or at least remain the same.

In turn, it forces retailers to raise their prices to keep up, which results in higher prices of goods, and higher retail taxes.

As a bare minimum the city should not raise property taxes next year. An Aug. 4 Argus Leader editorial agreed: “The 2010 budget offers a unique chance to hold the line on property tax increases.” Ignoring economic sense and the advice of the Argus Leader, two amendments to prohibit a city property tax increase were not even debated or voted on by the Sioux Falls City Council.

Which was very disappointing. Councilor Costello ‘pretends’ to be concerned about rising taxes and the recession, but when he has an opportunity to stop the silly increase, he is silent. Big surprise. Not.

On the other hand, time was devoted to debating the merits of spending $1,720,100 of taxpayer money on a new golf clubhouse and pond rehabilitation project at Prairie Green Golf Course. An amendment to delete the clubhouse project was overwhelmingly defeated by a vote of 7-1.

I agree with Kermit this is a silly expenditure for a city during a recession, but, the golf courses do make money for the city. But the way they spend those profits are flawed. The golf course should be able to have an endowment to build clubhouses without coming to the city.

Many people wonder why the City Council appears more concerned about spending for a golf clubhouse that would benefit the few, but it rejects any attempt to stop a property tax increase that would benefit most of the city’s population, including homeowners, business owners and renters (who pay the property tax in their rent). Simply, the answer is that the City Council is living in its own artificial world that consists of council members, the mayor, department heads and those individuals who have frequent contact with the city such as developers.

This one sentence alone explains our city government in a nutshell. I am not saying this because I know Kermit. I am saying this because I have seen, and still see the different levels of economic status in our community. A majority of our residents are lower middle-class or below. That’s the facts Jack. When the Gargoyle Leader cheerleads for more minorities and women on the council, they are missing the point, they need more working class, they are the ones not being represented, no matter what color or gender they are. They also need to give the middle finger to the developers and special interests. Government is set up to protect and serve the GENERAL PUBLIC not the RICH PUBLIC, that’s why we ALL pay taxes.

In this closed world, city officials embrace a progressive viewpoint that supports property tax increases each year and the building of expensive facilities such as the golf clubhouse at Prairie Green in order to enhance the city’s reputation for having quality facilities.

Not sure if Kermit was being sarcastic, but I don’t think blowing my taxes on stuff to benefit the Haves is ‘progressive’, as James Carville would say, it is ‘regressive’.

In the City Council’s artificial world, any references to real people being hurt by property tax increases are simply ignored.

They really live in another world, and I am not saying that to bring weight to Kermit’s statements. I watch the council meetings religiously, and I am shocked by the ‘Penthouse’ statements made by our councilors, even by the ones who don’t live in the Penthouse, but aspire.

This includes the real-life story of a widow living in Sioux Falls on a fixed income in a modest 1,000-plus square-foot house who worries that she might lose her home because she cannot afford the annual property tax increases. And there is the example of a single Sioux Falls mother working at three jobs to support her children while also trying to stay in their home despite property tax increases.

One story?! Shit, Kermit, I could tell you more then you want to hear.

In sharp contrast to the Sioux Falls City Council is Rapid City’s City Council staying in touch with the public by voting against a property tax increase. Furthermore, the mayor of Rapid City declared in the Sept. 22 Argus Leader: “We understand that times are tough and everyone needs to tighten the purse strings as much as possible, and I think the city government is no exception.”

I remember reading this and going, “Hank, please send that memo to Dave. PLEASE!!!!!!”

Now is the time for my fellow members on the Sioux Falls City Council to break out of their closed, artificial world and finally get in touch with the real people of Sioux Falls. Now is the time for Sioux Falls to follow the example of Rapid City and stop raising property taxes every year.

Kermit, I like you, and that advice is swell, but it will never happen. Maybe we should invite them to Borrowed Bucks to have a drink and discuss, hopefully the cops won’t have to show up to break up the fight, either way, they know the address.

Councilor Staggers wrote a great letter to the Argus Leader today on the petition drive;

Comparing the 2008 budget of $362 million to the 2009 budget of $412 million, spending will increase by a whopping 14 percent, way above the rate of inflation.

Geez, wouldn’t it be great to get a 14% raise every year?!