Know your hot button issues especially when running for mayor.

Jolene was on the Good Ship Lalley Pop (podcast has yet to post) show today, and she did pretty good, but she stumbled a bit when asked about the Downtown Parking Ramp. She said she supported the project and that it was good for downtown development. She went on to say that councilor Neitzert did a good job of ‘crunching numbers’ and explaining why we are paying double the national average for stalls. (Because we tax payers are taking on a 100% of the ‘soft costs’ which are about $6 million, and IMO should be SHARED with the developers like the ramp wrap, architectural and engineering designs, utility upgrades and reinforced foundation that is needed to support the PRIVATE hotel).

When Jolene was asked if the private investors should be released, she said YES. A good answer on it’s face . . . but.

What Jolene must not know, or has missed is that you can support this project all you want, but if you don’t support the investors staying secret you can’t support the project, it’s part of the convoluted plan. You can’t have your cake and eat it to.

The city doesn’t want us to know and says that NO public officials (or family members) are investing. Even if we trust them on that verbal only promise, there is NOTHING preventing public officials from investing in other NON-PUBLIC partnerships with the same secret investors, something I think is happening and is a conflict of interest IMO and probably the #1 reason these investors are being kept secret. It is NO secret that the mayor and some of the other councilors do invest in local development projects. But do these lines get a little blurred when you are helping your fellow investors out on a public project? You know, that whole back scratching thingy.

While the city has NO intentions of releasing the names of the private investors, only the guarantors, which includes Aaron Hultgren whose construction company has been fined thousands of dollars for OSHA safety violations for the Copper Lounge building collapse. Hultgren’s name alone attached to this project is another reason why the public should know most of the private investors.

I will give credit to Jolene for sticking up for transparency, but you can’t have it both ways as mayor. Private developers will fight you tooth and nail before releasing those names. So would Jolene cave to secrecy or would she forgo public/private development for transparency? Good question.

I have argued all along the best way to have transparency with development in Sioux Falls is by creating or eliminating regulation legislation that supports growth instead of handouts like TIF’s and taxpayer partnerships. These tax incentives NEVER trickle down to the common citizen taxpayer in this town. It hasn’t worked since Reagan introduced this asinine way of governing and it never will. Let FREE enterprise and development in Sioux Falls sink or swim on it’s own and let our tax dollars provide the services that truly trickle down to us all instead blowing millions on developer welfare projects.

So please Jolene, keep fighting for transparency, just don’t expect developers to get on board.

 

Pat and Theresa talk about the Downtown Parking Ramp Boondoggle, LISTEN HERE.

Replay of Belfrage’s interview this morning, LISTEN HERE and citizens reaction to the parking ramp, LISTEN HERE.

Pat and Theresa will also be at Democratic Forum talking about the project on Friday (noon at the VFW).

Theresa wrote a letter to the editor about the ramp, READ IT HERE.

Pat will also be on my Podcast on Monday talking about the Ramp.

It’s around the 1st anniversary of the Copper Lounge building collapse. Is it just me, or do I faintly remember the city talking about the rescue and cleanup efforts and who was going to pay for them.

Obviously, the construction company would have to cleanup their own demolished mess. But I do remember someone from the city saying that Hultgren would be billed for the extra effort in rescue and security from the city’s first responders.

Just curious if that bill was ever sent? How much it was? And if it was ever paid by the now defunct Hultgren Construction.

Oh the irony and hypocrisy of Mr. Hultgren signing as a guarantor for the Downtown Parking Ramp Village project corporate welfare handout if he never paid the city for the hundreds of hours of rescue and security efforts. And who can forget the 24/7 CityLink film crew.

It will be interesting to see how Mr. Turbak explains this one to us.

City Council Informational Meeting (11-14)

City Clerk Tom Greco first does a presentation on updates to the election procedures.

Than like a bad dream the Downtown Parking ramp returns. I’m hoping the council can kill this once and for all.

City Council Meeting (11-14)

The council has a very short agenda. Items 11-13 though are contract renewals for SMG, Ovations/Spectra, and the Pavilion.

As for SMG, if I had one criticism that sticks out with their management of several city facilities is I wish they would promote more shows themselves to make the city money (pay down mortgage). We already know the EC is extremely popular, and as I witnessed last night sells out all kinds of genres of music. Why not take the risk of promoting it’s own shows and cashing in?

As for Spectra (Ovations) I have heard several criticisms of the company and the way it staffs events. Besides not allowing tip jars (though my complaining got them to put tip lines on the CC slips now) they understaff. They also tend to use temporary labor. While that is fine in construction or other industry, when it comes to food & beverage service, that is worrisome.

The Washington Pavilion contract renewal is of great interest. While I could go on for awhile about how the Pavilion is ran, I will commend them for bringing in high quality musical acts and promoting most of their own shows. The great hall pulled in over $2 million dollars last year alone.

My issue with the contract renewal has more to do with the way the city and city council is handling it. With all the complaining about secrecy, transparency and RFP’s, wouldn’t it seem logical the city handled these contracts differently?

• There hasn’t been a city audit of the Pavilion in 10 years, with no yearly reviews.

• The 2016 audit of the Pavilion wasn’t released until last week, even though the external auditing firm gave it to the board of directors on June 20. Why the delay?

I believe he Pavilion financials should be reviewed better before renewing the contract. Oh, and, bring back the free galleries.

My public input on the matter last week (FF: 39:20)

Charter Revision Meeting (11-15)

The commission goes over several charter revisions suggested by city councilors. Joe Sneve writes an excellent review of the possible revisions.