http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071015/VOICES01/710150306/1162/VOICES01

Fellow bloggers have been discussing the purpose of our local press; essentially to be a watchdog for the citizens, especially when it comes to spending our tax dollars wisely. It seems our local press doesn’t care that half of SF is against building an Event Center, especially downtown. This past year they have supported, essentially wasting taxpayer’s money on ‘wants’ not ‘needs’ (Rec center, indoor pool, event center). It seems anything the AL endorses, fails, even political candidates. Where is the editorial support for snow gates on street plows that Staggers has been proposing for years! (it would help prevent 4 feet of snow being piled up in your driveway end).

Our local press needs to start concentrating on giving us news, not pipe dreams.

15188188.jpg

As a child I used to be able to draw all the PEANUTS characters by memory. But as I got older I started to embrace other cartoonists such as Crumb and Roth more, and my fascination with Charlie Brown ended.Though I’m not a huge fan of PEANUTS anymore, I think this book looks interesting. Supposedly the family is protesting the finished product because it sometimes shows Charles as a cold and negative person. Well, he is a cartoonist. I’m not saying every cartoonist is negative, but you do have to have some degree of cynicism in order to be a cartoonist. And last I checked, Charlie Brown wasn’t exactly the happiest person in the world.

Synopsis
A biography of Charles Schulz, the cartoonist, who is one of the misunderstood figures in American culture. It portraits a hidden American genius, and a chronicle contrasting the private man with the central role he played in shaping the national imagination.

The New York Times – Michiko Kakutani
It is Mr. Michaelis’s achievement in these pages that he leaves us with both a shrewd appreciation of Schulz’s minimalist art and a sympathetic understanding of Schulz the man. He shows us how Schulz’s sense of vocation as a young child, fueled by a fierce ambition, led him to the career he’d always wanted, and how he gradually assimilated a host of influences to find a voice that was inimitably his own. He also shows us how Schulz constructed an anomalous fictional world that captured the public imagination, eventually reaching readers in some 75 countries, 2,600 newspapers and 21 languages. At times the author’s prodigious research may overwhelm the casual reader, who may well wonder if we really need to know about all of Schulz’s unrequited crushes, all his panic attacks and spasms of self-doubt. But Mr. Michaelis, who had access to Schulz’s papers, has done a fluent job of weaving the many facts and anecdotes he’s collected into an engaging narrative that underscores how the artist’s solitary childhood in Minnesota—as the only child of a father preoccupied by work and a withholding, erratic mother—shaped both his insecurities and his will to succeed.

Wake up Sioux Falls!

Wealthy developers and the City Planning office are running are town. Enough is enough. If developers want the downtown land (considered blighted), they can negoiate with their own capital with the current landowners. Why should the taxpayers of SF be the middle man?

Why? Because we are getting duped into being the risktakers!

Read Councilor Stagger’s comments here:

http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071010/NEWS/710100310

10-10-07-dev.jpg