Why would you name a middle school after a gun?

While I have not taken issue with naming the new middle school after Ben Reifel, many people in the community (who have no clue who he is) have been saying the same thing, “Why would you name a school after a gun?” My response was, “Why would you allow the finance department of the SFSD count the votes on a $300 Millions dollar bond?”

Another reason why a ‘public’ vetting needed to be done when selecting the names of the schools. Yet again the elitists with the school district seem to think they know better than the public. At least picking a mascot will be easy.

Urine laced snowballs derail Black Iron Project

It’s not often I get to write headlines like that, and NO Adam White from the Sioux Falls Headliner didn’t help me on that one. It’s all true;

She said her husband went to a neighbor’s yard and urinated on a snowman. Later, after more yelling and as she left to drive her friend home, she said he kicked over the snowman and threw urine snowballs at her car.

While I have known about the big ‘D’ for awhile, like many things that go on behind the scenes, none of my business, but it seems the dirty laundry is out now. While I feel bad because I have known both Erika and Dave for a very long time and both of them have been very generous and kind to me over the years. They both have enormous personalities.

It’s also too bad the Black Iron project isn’t moving forward. Dave had let me in almost 2 years ago he was planning a project for the area. Hopefully something can come of it besides another square apartment building downtown by the Double ‘L’ Co.

I often tell friends I am thankful of three things 1) I don’t have children 2) I have never been married 3) I don’t have a lot of money. Three things that can force a man to throw urine laced snowballs.

Chief Medical Officer for Sioux Falls gets biggest raise in 2019, $12,000

One of the biggest irony of Dr. Jennifer Tinguely’s raise is that there are probably people she serves at Falls Community Health (FCH) that don’t even make that in a year. She went from $215K to $227K in one year. She is the highest paid city employee . . . she runs a clinic.

Is she a bad doctor or bad person? I highly doubt it. Anyone who would dedicate themselves to helping people with their medical needs should be commended. But as a city employee, I just don’t think she is needed.

As I have pointed out in the past when I was researching regional director pay, I couldn’t find any city in our region that had a CMO. Now some of the municipalities like Des Moines overlap with the county services, so it may be hidden somewhere else. But Lincoln, Omaha, Fargo and Des Moines didn’t have one. Why is this? Because I think a lot of these communities depend on Non-Profits to provide that care with Federal Assistance.

So what about the justification of her raise? The health department had 121 employees in 2017, 122 in 2018 and in 2019 they have 116, not sure how many work at FCH. Also, with so many medical staff members including 3 full-time dentists, why does the center need an MD as director? Jill Franken, the Health director who makes $163K a year could easily manage the facility. Let’s face it, FCH is a ‘clinic’. If anything serious arrises you would refer a patient to a specialist or the emergency room at one of our many healthcare facilities in Sioux Falls. The good doctor isn’t curing cancer. In fact, they basically help with minor afflictions, pulling bad teeth, and testing for the ‘itchy scratchy’.

Do I think it is a good idea to have a ‘doctor’ on staff. Yes. But you could easily contract a family doctor to come in a couple times a week to see certain patients. A nurse practitioner could easily handle most patients. FCH needs an administrator, not a MD running the joint.

It’s time to take another look at how FCH is ran.

UPDATE: Sioux Falls City Councilor Starr comments on the Municipal League suit

UPDATE: I guess the hearing has been called off, and Taylor is NO LONGER banned. Still waiting to hear more details. I wonder if our AG stopped eating cookies for a couple of minutes and read the constitution instead.

Pat called into the B-N-B show this morning (towards end) and expresses his feelings on the issue;

“I’m concerned as a taxpayer,” Starr told The Greg Belfrage Show this morning. “It’s a great group for the municipalities to come together across the state. This just distracts from the organization that does this for us.”

Starr said it, unfortunately, the parties have had to go to federal court to determine for what he calls “a personality conflict.”

“I think you expect professional decorum on both sides,” Starr said. “I’m disappointed.”

But he said he needed to back Taylor, as she has free speech rights and works for “his” organization.

“To ban someone indefinitely is overreaching and probably one of the reasons she used to for the terminology,” Starr said.

I think both Taylor and Haugaard were out of line, they should just make up and move on. But instead, it’s going to cost taxpayers coming and going;

So, win, lose, or draw, South Dakota taxpayers will be paying indirectly for the two sides’ attorneys.

If we had an AG’s office with at least a half a brain that actually understood the Constitution, they would have sent a polite letter to Haugaard telling him his actions were unconstitutional and that he had no right to ban Taylor. Then send a letter to Taylor telling her she was no longer banned. Pretty simple. The postage may have cost the taxpayers a couple of bucks, but problem solved. So now we have two publicly funded institutions fighting it out in Federal court over a clear violation of 1st Amendment rights. Not only is it ‘Whacky’ it’s down right stupid. I think our state house is not only full of ‘Whackies’ but it also is full of the mentally challenged, mentally ill and just down right ignorant. Put that in your pipe and smoke it Steve.